High CourtsSingle Bench

Sonu Masih vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0325

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 26, 61, 85 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379, 411
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 16613 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 292 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail in FIR No.369 dated 13.08.2016 under Sections 22/61/85 of NDPS Act and Sections 379, 411 IPC,

registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Amritsar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations in the FIR, recovery of 260 grams of intoxicant powder was effected from the

petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner was granted the concession of interim bail awaiting FSL report and later on, he could not appear

before the Court on 18.03.2019 and on 25.07.2019, he was declared as proclaimed offender, however, in the intervening period, the petitioner was

arrested in another FIR No.23 dated 09.04.2019. It is also submitted that since the petitioner was in custody in FIR No.23, he could not appear in the

present FIR.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as on today, the petitioner is in custody for the last about 01 year and 06 months and though the

charges have been framed in December, 2019, however, till date, no prosecution witness has been examined.

Learned State counsel, on the basis of custody certificate, has submitted that the petitioner is involved in two more FIRs; one under the Arms Act and

another under Prison Act, apart from aforesaid FIR No.23 under NDPS Act.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the fact that the petitioner was initially granted the concession of bail, but he could not

appear before the trial Court due to involvement in another FIR No.23, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular

bail subject to furnishing his bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

Petition is disposed of.