High CourtsSingle Bench

Sonu & Ors vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 498A · Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 4
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5048 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 386 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl. M.A. No.33430/2018 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Crl. M.C. No.5048/2018

1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.402/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Jyoti Nagar,

based on a settlement. Â

2.

Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law

and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. Petitioner Nos.4 and 5 are sisters-in-law of the respondent No.2. Â

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before Delhi Mediation

Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, on 17.08.2013. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed

on 16.01.2015.

4.

Respondent No.2 was to be paid a total sum of Rs.1,20,000/- in full and final settlement of all her claims. A sum of Rs.90,000/- has already been

paid. The balance sum of Rs.30,000/- has been paid to the respondent No.2 in cash.

5.

Respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her

disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.

6.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the

respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way

of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 16.01.2015, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the

case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.

It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed FIR No.402/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station

Jyoti Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. Â