High CourtsSingle Bench

Sonu @ Tinku vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 DEL CK 0312

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.4901 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 355 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.32874/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4901/2018

1.

On the oral prayer of the petitioner, Smt.Maya Devi w/o. Sh.Rajinderis impleaded as petitioner No.2. Amended memo of parties and her affidavit is

taken on record.

2.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 62 of 2012 under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi, based on a

settlement.It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.Â

3.

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court on

26.04.2016. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce, passed on 30.03.2018.

4.

As per the settlement, a sum of Rs. 60,000/- was agreed to be paid. A sum of Rs.40,000/- has already been paid. Banker’s Cheque No.222873

dated 17.07.2018 issued by Bank of India for Rs.20,000/- has been handed over and for the balance to respondent no. 2 who is present in Court in

person.

5.

Respondent no. 2 is present in court in person is identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has settled the disputes with the

petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

6.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled,

continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end

and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the

consequent proceedings emanating there from.Â

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 62 of 2012 under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar,Â

Delhi, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.Â