Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt Ltd vs Digicable Network India Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 7 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 TDSAT CK 0015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 683 Of 2016
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 141 words

Learned Counsel for Petitioner is to move an application on today itself for change of name of Petitioner’s Company. Copy has been served to the other side. Let it be filed. Registry is directed to give proper numbering.

As it is a formal application for bringing present name of the Petitioner Company and is not being opposed by other side, hence, allowed. Let amended Petition, by amended name of Petitioner, be filed on record.

Learned Counsel for Respondent requested for formal discharge because of appointment of RP for this Company. The same is being allowed. Formal discharge of Respondent is being granted. Counsel for RP is present. Learned Counsel for RP mentioned that the proceeding before NCLT is at advance stage for implementation of plan and it will take another 3 – 4 months.

List the matter ‘for directions’ on 17.5.2023.