High CourtsSingle Bench

Soran Lal (In Jail) vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 11 June 1999 · Citation: (1999) 2 ACR 1314

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.L. Singhal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 201, 304B, 498A
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9114 of 1999
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 118 words

M.L. Singhal, J.—I have heard Learned Counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

2.

The accused-applicant, father-in-law of the deceased has applied for bail under Sections 498A/304B/201, I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. There are general allegations of demand of dowry. The marriage took-place four years back. No specific role has been assigned to the accused-applicant. The applicant deserves bail.

3.

The accused-applicant Soran Lal in Case Crime No. 2 of 1999 under Sections 498A/304B/201 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. P. S. Lodha, district Aligarh shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.