High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 CAL CK 0052

Srei Equipment Finance Limited vs Goutam Singh & Anr.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 18 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 318 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 494 words

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept on record.

The petitioner seeks appointment of a Receiver in respect of five assets for which loans were disbursed to the respondents in terms of a loan-cum-

hypothecation Agreement dated 15th March, 2018. The fact that the five assets were hypothecated to the petitioner in exchange of the loan would

appear from the terms of the said Agreement. Under Schedule IV â€" The Events of Default â€" the Agreement provides that default by the

Customer (the respondents in this case) in the payment of any of the instalments for repayment, or dishonour of any cheque shall constitute an event

of default. The due date within which such repayment is to be made is clarified as 15th day of every month under Annexure-II to Schedule VII.

Article VII which provides for the remedies available to the petitioner would be clarified from Clause 7.2.1 thereunder which provides that in the

event of default, the petitioner shall have the right to enter and remain in any place where the asset is located and take possession of the said asset.

The Agreement contains jurisdiction clause which provides that Courts in Kolkata would have exclusive jurisdiction. The arbitration clause further

provides that the arbitration shall be held at Kolkata.

According to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the respondents have not made repayments after the 22nd instalment which constrained the

petitioner to terminate the Agreement on 17th June, 2021. The letter terminating the Agreement tabulates the total dues as approximately Rs.22.90

lakhs.

No one appears for the respondents despite service.

Upon perusing the relevant material on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has established a prima facie case for an interim order of

protection by reason of the clauses in the Agreement governing the dispute between the parties. The balance of convenience is also in favour of an

order being passed as prayed for since Clause 7.2.1 entitles the petitioner to certain specific remedies in the event of default. There are admitted

defaults on the part of the respondents in the present case.

In view of the above, there shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the Notice of Motion. Ms. Hasi Saha, Advocate, Bar Association Room No. 12,

is appointed as Receiver to take physical possession of the assets listed in prayer (a) of the petition. There shall also be an order of injunction

restraining the respondents from dealing with the assets which form the subject matter of the dispute till further orders are passed on this petition. The

Receiver shall be entitled to a remuneration of Rs.70,000/- to be paid by the petitioner who shall also arrange for travel and accommodation and other

incidental expenses of the Receiver since she has to travel to Odisha. The Advocate-on-Record of the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this

order on the respondents within 48 hours from date.

List this matter after four weeks.