AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 575 wordsSince these two petitions are in respect of same crime number and common questions of law and facts are involved in these two petitions, they
are taken up together to dispose of them by this common order and in order to avoid repetition of discussion of facts and law.
Crl.P.636/2018 is filed by petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2, 4 to 8 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail and Crl.P.634/2018 is
filed by petitioner/accused Nos.3 and 9 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking their release on bail of the offences punishable under Sections 143,
144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 read with 149 of IPC, registered in respondent - police station Crime No.204/2017.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused in respect of both the petitions and also the learned High
Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
I have perused the grounds urged in both the bail petitions, FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.
During the course of hearing the petition, learned counsel for the petitioners has made the submission that the injured has already been
discharged from the hospital and even he has shown the injury certificate, wherein it is mentioned that the injured has sustained totally six injuries,
out of which, five injuries are simple and one is grievous in nature.
It is submitted by both sides that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. Therefore, for the present, the condition of the
injured is safe and out of danger. The petitioners have denied the allegations made in the complaint about their involvement in committing the
alleged offence and they have undertaken to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Though the alleged offence under Section 307
of IPC is a major offence, which is non-bailable in nature, but it is not exclusively punishable with death or imprisonment for life. Hence, I am of the
opinion that by imposing reasonable conditions, petitioners can be admitted to anticipatory as well as regular bail respectively.
Accordingly, Crl.P.636/2018 is allowed. The respondent-Police is directed to enlarge the petitioners in Crl.P.636/2018 on bail in the event of
their arrest in connection with Crime No.204/2017 registered for the above said offences, subject to the following conditions:
i. Petitioners shall execute a personal bond for Rs.50,000/- each and shall furnish one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the arresting
authority.
ii. Petitioners shall not tamper with any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or indirectly.
iii. Petitioners have to make themselves available before the Investigating Officer for interrogation, as and when called for and to cooperate with the
further investigation.
iv. The petitioners have to appear before the concerned Court within 30 days from the date of this order and to execute the personal bond and the
surety bond.
Accordingly, Crl.P.634/2018 is allowed. Petitioners/accused in Crl.P.634/2018 are ordered to be released on bail for the offence punishable
under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 read with 149 of IPC, registered in respondent - police station Crime
No.204/2017, subject to the following conditions:
i. Petitioners shall execute a personal bond for Rs.50,000/- each and shall furnish one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the concerned
Court.
ii. Petitioners shall not tamper with any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or indirectly.
iii. Petitioners have to appear before the concerned Court regularly.
