High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 12 KAR CK 0013

Sri Parashiva Murthy @ Paramesha (A-6) Vs State of Karnataka By Magadi Police

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 5 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Budihal R.B.
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
8693 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

55 paragraphs · 460 words
1.

This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused

No.6 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on

bail for the offences punishable under Sections 143,

147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 504, 307 r/w Section 149 of

IPC registered in respondent - police station Crime

No.1/2017. Subsequently, after demise of Shivakumar,

the offence under Section 302 of IPC in place of 307 of

IPC was also inserted in the case.

2.

Heard the arguments of the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner/accused No.6 and also the

learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for

the respondent-State.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner during the

course of his arguments submitted that as per the

complaint allegations and also the statements of alleged

eyewitnesses, allegation as against the petitioner is that

he assaulted with club on the complainant Asha and

not on deceased Shivakumar. He submitted that with

the similar set of allegations, this Court has already

considered the bail petition of accused No.1 and granted

bail to him. Now investigation is completed and charge

sheet is also filed. Hence, by imposing reasonable

conditions petitioner-accused No.6 may be enlarged on

bail.

4.

Per-contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader opposed the bail petition on the ground that as

per the prosecution material there is prima facie case as

against the petitioner also of his involvement in

committing the alleged offences. Hence, he is not

entitled to be granted with bail.

5.

I have perused the grounds urged in the bail

petition, FIR, complaint and other materials placed on

record, so also, the order of this Court dated 26.10.2017

passed in Crl.P.No.7232/2017 in respect of accused

No.1 Umesha.

6.

While considering the bail petition of accused

No.1, this Court has discussed the entire merits of the

case and ultimately, allowed the bail petition of accused

No.1 and granted bail to him. Perusing the allegations

made in the complaint and also the statement of the

eyewitnesses recorded during investigation, there is no

specific allegation as against the petitioner that he

assaulted Shivakumar, the deceased, with club. The

only allegation is that he assaulted the complainant

Smt.Asha. Therefore, the allegations as against the

petitioner and accused No.1 are one and the same.

7.

Hence, petition is allowed.

Petitioner/accused No.6 is ordered to be released on

bail for the offences punishable under Sections 143,

147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 504, 302 r/w Section 149 of

IPC registered in respondent - police station Crime

No.1/2017, subject to the following conditions:

i. Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and furnish one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

ii. Petitioner shall not tamper with any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or indirectly.

iii. Petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court regularly.