High Courts(1958) 08 AP CK 0013

Sri Ramachandra Spinning Mills vs Its Workmen (Pandalapaka Labour Union) and Others

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 18 August 1958 · Citation: (1959) 1 LLJ 244

RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.M.P. No. 5653 of 1958

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 174 words
1.

In regard to the question of jurisdiction, the petitioner relies on S. 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947) which runs thus :

"During the pendency of any conciliation proceedings or proceedings before a tribunal in respect of any industrial dispute, no employer shall -

(a) alter, to the prejudice of the workmen concerned in such dispute, the conditions of service applicable to them immediately before the commencement of such proceedings; or

(b) discharge or punish, whether by dismissal or otherwise, any workman concerned in such dispute, save with the express permission in writing of the conciliation officer, board, or tribunal, as the case may be."

2.

His argument is that the High Court is a "tribunal" in regard to labour disputes. But that expression has been defined in S. 2(r) of the Industrial Disputes Act as an industrial tribunal constituted under S. 7A of the Act. The High Court is not a tribunal contemplated under S. 33 of the Act and the petition is not maintainable. The petition is dismissed.