AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 165 wordsK.N. Keshavanarayana
It is noticed that this petitioner had earlier approached this Court u/s 438 Cr.P.C. in Crl.P. No. 1918/12. This Court while dismissing the said petition on merits, directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail. Instead of surrendering himself before the trial court, the petitioner seems to have approached the Sessions Court again u/s 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking the relief of anticipatory bail. The said petition came to be rejected. Once again the petitioner is before this Court. Having regard to the fact that the earlier petition filed by this petitioner u/s 438 of Cr.P.C. came to be rejected by this Court on merits and he was directed to surrender before the trial court and then to seek regular bail, in my opinion, this successive bail petition u/s 438 of Cr.P.C. is not maintainable. Therefore, this petition is rejected. However, it is open to the petitioner to surrender himself before the trial court and seek regular bail.
