AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
24 paragraphs · 447 wordsS.K. Panigrahi, J
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner has filed this CRLMC assailing the order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack
in G.R. Case No.54 of 2018, arising out of Choudwar P.S. Case No.144 of 2018 registered for commission of offences under Sections 376(2)(i)/506
of the I.P.C. read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, issuing N.B.W. against him.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner is on bail vide order dated 07.01.2019 passed by this Court in BLAPL No.6723 of
2018. He was regularly attending the court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 10.02.2020, the petitioner could not remain present in
court due to some unavoidable circumstances as he is a daily wage labourer. Hence, the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack
issued N.B.W. against him. He further submits that the petitioner undertake that he will cooperate till the end of the trial and appear before the court
on each date of posting without fail, failing which, fresh N.B.W. shall be issued against him.
In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the CRLMC. Accordingly, the
order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack in the aforesaid case, so far it relates to issuance of
N.B.W. against the petitioner, is hereby quashed.
The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen
days hence. On such event, the said court shall release him on bail with some stringent conditions so as to enable him to appear before the court on
each date of posting of the case. In addition, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand only) as cost for violating the
court’s order. The said amount shall be deposited with the High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund and copy of the receipt of the said deposit
shall be presented before the court in seisin over the matter.
Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the
High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide
Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 and Court’s Office Order dated 7th January, 2022..
...............................................
