High CourtsSingle Bench

Srikant Das vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 OHC CK 0134

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Panigrahi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2)(i), 506 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRLMC No. 2879 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 447 words

S.K. Panigrahi, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

The petitioner has filed this CRLMC assailing the order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack

in G.R. Case No.54 of 2018, arising out of Choudwar P.S. Case No.144 of 2018 registered for commission of offences under Sections 376(2)(i)/506

of the I.P.C. read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, issuing N.B.W. against him.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner is on bail vide order dated 07.01.2019 passed by this Court in BLAPL No.6723 of

2018. He was regularly attending the court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 10.02.2020, the petitioner could not remain present in

court due to some unavoidable circumstances as he is a daily wage labourer. Hence, the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack

issued N.B.W. against him. He further submits that the petitioner undertake that he will cooperate till the end of the trial and appear before the court

on each date of posting without fail, failing which, fresh N.B.W. shall be issued against him.

5.

In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the CRLMC. Accordingly, the

order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cuttack in the aforesaid case, so far it relates to issuance of

N.B.W. against the petitioner, is hereby quashed.

6.

The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen

days hence. On such event, the said court shall release him on bail with some stringent conditions so as to enable him to appear before the court on

each date of posting of the case. In addition, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand only) as cost for violating the

court’s order. The said amount shall be deposited with the High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund and copy of the receipt of the said deposit

shall be presented before the court in seisin over the matter.

7.

Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.

8.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the

High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 and Court’s Office Order dated 7th January, 2022..

...............................................