AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Vishal Dhagat, J
The petitioners have filed the present petition challenging notices dated 23.10.2020 and 23.11.2020 (Annexures P/5 & P/6). By the said notices
petitioners were asked to deposit balance dues of property tax. If said dues were not deposited then action may be taken against the petitioners under
section 167(1) of Municipalities Act, 1961.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioner no.1 is an educational institution which is run by petitioner no.2. The institution works only
for educational purposes, therefore, as per Section 127-A(2)(c) of the Act, property is exempted from property tax. The petitioner/institution has
preferred an application/objection before the authority stating that said property tax cannot be levied on the petitioner/institution due to said exemption,
however application filed by the petitioner/institution has not been considered. In view of the same it is prayed that respondents be directed to consider
and decide the objection raised by the petitioner/institution within some reasonable time and meanwhile no coercive action be taken against the
petitioner/institution.
Considering the grounds raised in the petition, this petition is disposed of with a direction to Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Panagar,
District Jabalpur to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioners within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy
of this order.
In the meanwhile, it is directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner/institution.
With the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed off.
C.C as per rules.
