AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 282 wordsHeard
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court in WPC No. 1410/2019 dated 12.04.2019 has passed the following order:-
In view of the above position, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners make a fresh representation within a
period of four weeks from today along-with the copy of the order dated 06.02.2019 passed in WPC No.1649/2017 and other documents, the
concerned respondents shall consider and decide the same within a further period of ten weeks from the date of presentation of copy of this
order.
It is further submitted that the Division Bench order which was passed earlier on 30.10.2018 in WPC No. 1649/2017 has been reviewed
subsequently on 12.12.2019, therefore the Division Bench itself has reviewed the order and thus the direction as given in para 4 in WPC No.
1410/2019 may be reviewed.
A perusal of Para 4 of the direction issued by this Court on 12.04.2019 in WPC No. 1410/2019 only speaks that the Collector shall decide the
representation within a specified time in view of the notification issued by the State in terms of the direction issued by the Division Bench. This Court
has not expressed any opinion on specific particulars of the Division Bench order and if the Division Bench order which has been passed on
30.10.2018 has been reviewed on 12.12.2019, then it will also be within the ambit of the Division Bench order. The State, therefore, can pass the order
in view of the review order passed by the Division Bench. No review of the order dated 12.04.2019 is called for.
With the aforesaid direction/ observation, the writ petition stands disposed off.
