AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 233 wordsRavi Malimath, J
Aggrieved by the order dated 09.10.2015, passed by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No.159 of 2015, titled Hoshiar
Singh Versus State of HP and others, the State has filed this petition.
The respondent herein sought for regularization of his services w.e.f. 01.01.2010 and not from the date of regularization granted to him on
15.01.2013.
On considering the contentions of both parties, the Tribunal in terms of the impugned order held at para 6 as follows:-
“6. Accordingly, the original application is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider case of the applicant for regularization on
completion of 8 years service with all consequential benefits within a period of two months.â€
Aggrieved by the said order, the State has filed this petition.
On considering the contentions and the reasons assigned, we do not find any ground to entertain this petition. The Tribunal has only directed
consideration of the case of the applicant (respondent herein) for regularization. Whether he is entitled for regularization or not, is to be determined by
the State in terms of the order of the Tribunal.
Therefore, it cannot be said that the State is aggrieved by such an order. Consequently, the petition is disposed off. The direction given in the
impugned order shall be complied with by the State within a period of three months from today.
