High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 02 J&K CK 0003

State of Jammu & Kashmir vs Zarda Begum and Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 22 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 1 JKJ 817

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aftab H. Saikia, C.J · Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J
CASE NUMBER
LPAC No. 13 of 2004

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 434 words

Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.—This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10th of February 2003 passed by

the learned Single Judge in the first Civil Appeal titled as State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Zarda Begum and Ors., whereby the judgment and

decree of the trial Court came to be upheld [for short impugned judgment].

2.

Respondents-Plaintiffs filed a civil suit for grant of compensation to the tune of Rs. 21,75,218/- on the grounds taken therein. Appellant-

Defendant resisted the suit, came to be decreed vide judgment and decree dated 20th of March 2001. Appellant Defendant was directed to pay

an amount of Rs. 5,04,000/- as compensation with costs and interest @ 12 per cent per annum from the date of institution of the suit, was upheld

by the Appellate Court-learned Single Judge vide impugned judgment. Learned Counsel for the Appellant-Defendant stated at bar that they have

deposited an amount of Rs. 2.50 Lacs and same stands released in favour of the Respondents-Plaintiffs. Learned Counsel for the Respondents-

Plaintiffs also stated at bar that Rs. 2.50 Lacs came to be deposited on 28th of June 2004 and stands also disbursed to the Respondents-Plaintiffs

through cross Cheque and prayed that the Appellant-Defendant be directed to deposit rest of the amount.

3.

After long drawn discussions and negotiations, learned Counsel for the Appellant-Defendant stated at bar that they have no objection in case the

matter is settled by reducing the interest from 12 per cent to 6 per cent per annum and it be made payable from the date of judgment and decree of

the trial Court. His statement is taken on record. Mr. Kohli, learned Counsel for the Respondents Plaintiffs, stated that his clients have no objection

to the said proposition. His statement is also taken on record.

4.

We have considered the matter and are of the view that the settlement arrived at is lawful and in the interest of the parties. Accordingly, we are

inclined to modify the impugned judgment by reducing the rate of interest from 12 per cent to 6 per cent, per annum, payable from 20th of March

2001, i.e., the date of judgment and decree, till its final realization. It is made clear that 6 per cent interest is payable on amount of Rs. 5.04 Lacs

from 20th of March 2001 till 28th of June 2004 and thereafter @ 6 per cent only on amount of Rs. 2.54 Lacs from 28th of June 2004 till its

realization, without costs.

5.

As discussed hereinabove, the impugned judgment and decree is modified and appeal is disposed of.