Supreme CourtDivision Bench

State Of Maharashtra vs Shankar Mayappa Kamble (Since Deceased) Through Lrs & Ors

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 15 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 02 SC CK 0333

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Mishra, J · Navin Sinha, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No(S). 1680 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 135 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

There was delay of two years 66 days in filing of the Regular Civil Appeal. It ought to have been filed within time. However, it appears that there was remiss on the part of the concerned officer in filing the appeal within time.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case that the R.T.O. is located in the area in question we condone the aforesaid delay, subject to payment of costs of Rs.25,000/-, to be paid to Respondent Nos. 1 to 9, within eight weeks from today.

4.

Let the appeal be heard afresh on merits and be decided in accordance with law by the District Court, Sangli.

5 The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is, accordingly allowed.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.