Supreme CourtDivision Bench

State of U.P. vs Nasruddin and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 17 January 2000 · Citation: (2000) 3 ACR 2110 : (2000) CriLJ 4996 : (2000) 8 JT 487

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. B. Shah, J · K. T. Thomas, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2000 (arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 3438 of 1999)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 128 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

Heard both sides.

3.

The impugned judgment is another instance of pre-bargain to which a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court had yielded. In the light of the decision of this Court in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Chandrika, , we upset the impugned judgment and direct the Allahabad High Court to dispose of the appeal afresh. Respondents will remain on bail till disposal of the appeal on the same bond on which they were released during the pendency of that appeal. It is submitted that respondents have remitted a total amount of Rs. 10,000/- pursuant to the said judgment. We permit them to apply for refund of the said amount without prejudice.

4.

With these observations, we dispose of this appeal.