High CourtsDivision Bench

State Of Uttarakhand vs Kirtiram Naudiyal & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 13 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 UK CK 0064

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ · Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Special Appeal No. 344 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 119 words

Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ

1.

The appellant is aggrieved by the legality of the interim order dated 26.11.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the

learned Single Judge has directed the appellant/ respondent to pay the minimum wages fixed by the State to the writ petitioner.

2.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that, although he has filed the counter affidavit to the writ petition, the appellant/respondent has not

filed any application for vacating of the stay order.

3.

Since this appeal arises from an interim order, the appellant/respondent is free to file an application for vacating of the stay order, if so advised.

4.

With these observations, the Special Appeal stands disposed of.