High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 OHC CK 0119

Steel Authority Of India And Others vs M/S. Ores India (P) Ltd

Orissa High Court · Decided on 16 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
CASE NUMBER
ARBA No.8 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 203 words

Arindam Sinha, J

I.A. No.23 of 021Â

1.

Mr. Saha, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of applicant and submits, his client is award holder. His client applied by I.A. no.23 of 2021 for

modification of order dated 15th September, 2021 to the extent that appellant should deposit entire awarded amount along with accrued interest, at

Rs.81,41,46,459. He submits, by order dated 15th September, 2021 there was direction upon appellant to deposit only Rs.30.00,00,000/- in the

executing Court.

2.

He draws attention to subsection (3) in section 36, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to submit, the Court may direct stay of execution, firstly,

subject to such conditions it may deem fit and secondly, on reasons to be recorded in writing. He refers to said order dated 15th September, 2021 and

submits, the order does not state reasons. Hence, the application for modification.

3.

Mr. Nanda, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of appellant. He has not been called upon to submit.

4.

Said order dated 15th September, 2021 was passed by co-ordinate Bench. The learned Judge is available. In fitness of things this Bench is not

inclined to hear the modification application. It is released from the list. Applicant may seek assignment.

...........................................