AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 251 wordsH.R. Kanna, J.
1.This is an appeal by special leave by Subbaiah Amba lam against the judgment of the Madras High Court confirming on appeal and reference the conviction of the appellant u/s 302, I.P.C. and the sentence of death.
We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and are of the opinion that this is a fit case in which the matter should be remand ed to the High Court for re-hearing of the appeal and reference. The judgment of the High Court appeal ed against covers less than a page. There is no discussion of the evidence adduced in the case and the learned Judges have disposed of the evidence by two sentences which read as under:
They swore that they saw the occurrence themselves. The learned Sessions Judge has accepted their evidence and on a careful perusal of their evidence, we agree with him.
It is well settled that in a Reference u/s 374 of the CrPC for confirming death sentence, the High Court has to consider the evidence afresh and to arrive at its independent finding with regard to the guilt of tike accused. We are distressed to find that to the judgment appealed against this statuary requirement has not been complied with and a case involving death sentence has been disposed of in a casual manner. We therefore accept the appeal, set aside the Judgment of the High Court and remand the case to the High Court for disposal in accordance with law.