High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 07 MAD CK 0013

Subbanarayana Aiyar vs Maya Thevan alias Mayandi Thevan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 July 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 550(1) : 30 Ind. Cas. 263 : (1915) 2 LW 608

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sadasiva Aiyar, J · Oldfield, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 100 words
1.

It is argued that the provisions in the compromise petition were made part oft eh decree and are, therefore, executable with it. But the decree,

through it makes executable its terms only so far as they relate to the suit against defendant?. And we cannot find that the terms 7 and 8 relate to it

either directly or, as the District Munsif held, indirectly as indicating a quid pro quo, on which the settlement of the plaint claim was based. In these

circumstances we agree with the learned District Judge and dismiss the appeal against appellate order with costs.