High CourtsDivision Bench

Subbaroyadu vs Gangayya

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 January 1906 · Citation: (1906) ILR (Mad) 329

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moore, J · Benson, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 — Section 23
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 152 words
1.

The object of Section 23 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts'' Act is to enable the Small Cause Court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction in a

small cause suit, when the right of the plaintiff and the relief claimed by him depend upon the proof or disproof of a title to Immovable property or

other title which the Small Cause Court cannot finally determine, and to return the plaint to be presented to a Court having jurisdiction to determine

the title. The exercise of the power is discretionary with the Small Cause Court, and when it is exercised the effect is to give the Court''s jurisdiction

to try the small cause suit as an original suit notwithstanding anything in Section 16 of the Act Muhamaya Dasya v. Nitya Hari Das Bairagi ILR 23

Cale. 425. The District Munsif must therefore receive the plaint and deal with it according to law.