High CourtsSingle Bench

Subhash Chandra Khatik vs Madan Nath And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 February 2024 · Citation: (2024) 02 RAJ CK 0001

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rekha Borana, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1027 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 195 words

Rekha Borana, J

1.

On 30.08.2018, the notices of application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act were directed to be issued. In pursuance to the said order, PF and notices were filed but extra sets of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act were not filed despite time been granted thrice by Deputy Registrar (Judicial) and Registrar (Admn.).

2.

Ultimately, on 05.07.2023, the service on respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 & 5 was dispensed with. However, notices for respondent No.3 were directed to be filed within a period of two weeks. The same having not been filed, the matter was listed before the Court on 19.01.2024. On that date, last opportunity of one week was granted to do the needful. It was also observed on that date that if the requisites are not filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be listed before the Court for dismissal. In pursuance to the said order, the appeal has been listed today.

3.

Today, none has appeared for the appellant.

4.

As per the office report, the requisites have also not been filed.

5.

In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed in non-compliance.