Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Subhash Chandra Sharma vs Union Of India And Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 26 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 CAT CK 0067

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Diary No. 2126 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 107 words

Dr. Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)

1.

None present for the applicant even in the revised call. Shri Vidyapati Tripathi brief holder of Shri P.K. Rai, learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2.

A perusal of the order sheets shows that on the previous listed date i.e. 23.05.2023, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Today, also there is no request on behalf of the applicant’s counsel for adjournment. It appears that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the OA (Bearing Dy. No. 2126/2020) is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. All associated MAs, if any, are also disposed of. No costs.