High CourtsDivision Bench

Subhash Sehgal vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 P&H CK 0962

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sheel Nagu, CJ · Sanjiv Berry, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 115 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 219 words

Sheel Nagu, CJ

1.

This petition has been filed as a PIL, raising alleged public cause of conduction of inquiry against the functionaries of the Improvement Trust, Amritsar, since they are allegedly indulging in corrupt deeds.

2.

We were intially inclined to relegate the petitioner to the Lokpal, where complaint can be filed but the learned counsel for respondent No.3 has apprised this Court that the petition suffers from suppression of material facts to the extent that only five out of six FIRs registered against the petitioner have been disclosed. FIR No.89 dated 13.06.2018 has not been disclosed which amounts to suppression of material facts. It is also disclosed by learned counsel for respondent No.3 that DDR No.30 dated 03.04.2023 registered at P.S. Gate Hakima, District Amritsar, is also pending and this fact has also not been disclosed anywhere in this petition.

3.

In view of the above and in view of no satisfactory explanation given by learned counsel for the petitioner in regard to suppression of material facts, this Court is inclined to and dismisses this petition with costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the Poor Patients Welfare Fund of the PGIMER, Chandigarh.

4.

However, the dismissal of this petition shall not come in way of the petitioner to approach the Lokpal by filing an appropriate complaint.