AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 431 wordsR.K. Gauba, J
The parties are locked in litigation in two suits, both having been initially filed on the original side of this court. The civil suit (OS) No.1416/2009
instituted by the petitioner herein was the first in time in which the respondent is the defendant. The other suit, now registered as Suit No.10096/2016 -
old CS (OS) No.3241/2011 â€" was instituted by the respondent herein against the petitioner, it also having been presented on the original side in this
court. Subsequently, on account of change of the pecuniary jurisdiction, the second said suit, i.e. suit filed by the first respondent, was transferred to
the file of the district court and is presently pending before the court of Additional District Judge-03, South-East at Saket District Court, presided over
by Mr. Mohinder Virat, ADJ. The suit of the petitioner, however, has been retained here against the backdrop that on her application she was allowed
to state enhanced valuation of the relief, rendering it a case triable on the original side by this court.
It is pointed out that when both the suits were pending on the original side of this court, by order dated 25.02.2014, on IA No.1261/2012, with the
consent of the first respondent, both the suits were consolidated for purposes of trial and decision. It is clear that both suits are between the said same
set of parties and give rise to substantially common questions of facts.
The objection raised by the first respondent to the prayer in the transfer petition is that her appeal against the amendment of the plaint whereby the
valuation has been enhanced is pending before the division bench of this court. In the considered view of this court, the reasons set out by the first
respondent cannot come in the way. The decision rendered by the division bench, as and when granted, would regulate the proceedings thereafter. For
the present, the directions earlier issued for consolidation of the two cases itself are sufficient to grant the relief on the transfer petition.
Thus, the petition is allowed. The civil suit - Suit No.10096/2016, titled Geeta Gandhi vs. Subhanshini Malik & Ors., (old CS (OS) No.3241/2011) -
pending on the file of Mr. Mohinder Virat, Additional District Judge-03, District South-East, Saket District Court, Delhi is withdrawn from the said
court and transferred to the original side of this court for further proceedings in accordance with law. The transferor court shall fix appropriate date
directing the parties to appear before this court for further proceedings.
The petition stands disposed of in above terms.
