High CourtsSingle Bench

Subhranshu Sekhar Parida vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 4 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 OHC CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Mohapatra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 341, 385, 386, 419, 506
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2407 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 547 words

A.K. Mohapatra, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the Petitioner for bail in connection with P.S. Case No. 59/2024 corresponding to G.R.Case No. 109/2024 pending in the Court of the learned JMFC, Jatni for alleged commission of offence under Section 341/419/385/386/506/120-B of I.P.C.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that earlier this matter was not before any other Bench of this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 18.02.2024. He further submitted that the investigation has progressed substantially and I.O. is likely to file a charge sheet very soon. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that the petitioner has not received any money from the informant. It was also contended that the cheque amount of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees Five Lakh) was not encashed and the same has been seized by the police. It was also contended that there is no specific allegation of any overt act so far the present petitioner is concerned. It was also contended that the petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner be released on bail on such terms and conditions as this Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand opposed the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground that the Petitioner is released on bail there is a possibility he might indulge in similar criminal offences. Accordingly, it was prayed that the bail application of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on careful consideration of the surrounding facts as well as materials on record, further taking into consideration the period of detention, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) with one local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

7.

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to depositing a cash security of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) before the learned Court in seisin over the matter, which shall be kept in any Nationalized bank in interest bearing account initially for a period of one year which will be renewable from time to time till conclusion of trial and the same shall be abide by the final outcome of the trial of the case.

8.

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to the condition that the court below shall verify whether the Petitioner is having any criminal antecedent of similar nature. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is having any similar criminal antecedent, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked.

9.

BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

10.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

..………………………..