High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 PAT CK 0061

Sudhanshu Kumar son of Sri Sanjay Singh vs The Bihar School Examination Board

Patna High Court · Decided on 13 February 2017 · Citation: (2017) 2 PLJR 135

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Ravi Ranjan
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1943 Of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

33 paragraphs · 341 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2.

Petitioner''s grievance is that in the check-list of the

Intermediate Examination (Session 2015-17), as contained in

Annexure-4, at the serial no. 806, in the place of the petitioner''s

name, the name of one Shreya Singh appears, father''s name has

wrongly been entered though the name of mother is correct and

the photograph of the petitioner is correctly pasted there.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner drew attention of

this Court towards Annexure-7 to show that the aforesaid Shreya

Singh has given a separate registration number. It is contended

that though the School has also written to the Secretary Bihar

School Examination Board vide Annexure-5 on 09.01.2017 itself

but correction of the name has not been done and due to that the

petitioner has not been given admit card in his name so that he

could appear in the 12th Board Examination which is to commence

from tomorrow.

4.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

Board. It is stated that a chance was given to the School to rectify

the mistake online or by sending objection through e-mail but that

was not done and at the fag end this writ petition has been filed.

5.

In my view, the petitioner even though the School did

not take action within the time, he being a student cannot be

faulted with. Apparently, his name is missing from Annexure-4

though his picture is there. In such a situation, this Court would

direct the respondent Board to allow the petitioner to appear in the

concerned examination. Since it is submitted that at the fag end

several unwarranted persons may come and under the garb of such

situation taking advantage thereof may avail opportunity of

writing the examination which they are not supposed to do, the

Board would be at liberty to hold an inquiry regarding the

credentials of the petitioner and his result would only be declared

if nothing is found against him.

6.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.