High CourtsSingle Bench

Sujata Karki vs State Of Sikkim And Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 13 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 SIK CK 1081

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 5 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 167 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Ms Deblina Chattaraj and Mr. Prem Simon Chettri, learned Advocates, desire to appear on behalf of the respondent no.3, however, they have not filed their vakalatnama. They undertake to do so within three days.

2.

The learned Government Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2 submits that counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State respondents. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India states they have filed their counter-affidavit, however, it is in defect and she undertakes to cure it during the course of the day.

3.

Although, the learned counsel who desires to appear for respondent no.3 submits that she will require three weeks' time to file their counter-affidavit, keeping in mind the order passed on 26.03.2026, the respondent no.3 is directed to file the counter-affidavit within a period of two weeks from today. Further, if the petitioner desires to file rejoinder to the counter-affidavit, he may do so within two weeks of receipt of the counter-affidavit.

4.

List on 22.06.2026.