High CourtsSingle Bench

Sujeet vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 28 May 2020 · Citation: (2020) 05 MP CK 0166

HON’BLE JUDGES
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Parishad Adhiniyam, 1987 — Section 21 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 397(1)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 1410 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 456 words

Heard on admission.

Record of the courts below is available.

The revision petition is admitted for final hearing.

Also heard on I.A.No.5140/2020 filed by the applicant/accused under section 397 (1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of his jail sentence awarded by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, District Khandwa in criminal appeal no. 85/2019 vide its judgment dated 27/02/2020 affirming the conviction under Section 21 of the M.P. Ayurvighyan Parishad Adhniyam and sentencing him to undergo RI for 1 years and fine amount of of Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is in custody since 27/02/2020 and regular hearing of the case will take time. Hence, looking to the nature of the offence and period of the custody, the applicant be enlarged on bail by suspending the jail sentence.

Learned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Having heard the contentions of learned counsel for the applicant and looking to the nature of the offence as well as the period of custody incarcerated by applicant in jail, the execution of the jail sentence of the applicant Sujeet shall remain suspended till further orders and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the trial court firstly on 9/11/2020 and thereafter, on all such subsequent dates as may be fixed by the trial court subject  to final order on the application.

In view of the outbreak of "Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19)", the applicant shall also comply with the rules and norms of social distancing.

Further, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme court in suo motu W.P.No.1/2020, it would be appropriate to issue the following directions to the Jail authorities :-

1.

The Jail Authority shall ensure the medical examination of the applicant by the jail doctor before his/her/their release.

2.

The applicant shall not be released if he is suffering from "Corona Virus Disease" and for this purpose, appropriate tests will be carried out.

3.

If it is found that the applicant is suffering from "Corona Virus Disease" necessary steps will be taken by the concerned authority by placing him in appropriate quarantine facility.

4.

If the applicant is not found infected with the alleged virus, the jail authority shall ensure his transportation from the jail to his place of residence.

The transportation shall be done in full compliance of the rules and norms of social distancing.

List the case for final hearing in due course of time. Certified copy as per rules.