High CourtsSingle Bench

Sukhdev Raj vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 June 2020 · Citation: (2020) 06 P&H CK 0067

HON’BLE JUDGES
Fateh Deep Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 12941 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 137 words

Fateh Deep Singh, J

The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing on account of outbreak of pandemic COVID-19.

Notice of the application.

Mr. Baljinder Virk, DAG, Haryana puts in appearance on behalf of the State of his own and accepts notice. Let copy of the application be supplied to

him.

In the light of the averments in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

It is made clear that, subsequently, the applicant/appellant shall be under obligation to fulfil these requirements, such as, filing of court fee, process fee,

welfare stamp and duly marked vakalatnama in due course.

CRM M-12941 OF 2020

After arguing at length for some time, faced with the likely consequences, learned counsel for the petitioner has made statement withdrawing the

present petition.

Allowed to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn.