AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 155 wordsCounsel for the petitioners states that question of law as raised in the present writ petition with regard to the grant of benefit of promotional increment after rendereing 23 years of service has already been decided by a coordinate bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions i.e. CWP No.1013 of 2017(O&M) and other connected cases, decided on 29.11.2018, titled as Balvir Singh Vs. PSPCL and another.
Counsel for the petitioners prays that the present writ petition be also disposed of in the same terms as Balvir Singh's case (supra).
Counsel for the respondents has no objection with regard to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners.
Keeping in view the request made by the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in CWP No.1013 of 2017(O&M) and other connected cases, decided on 29.11.2018, titled as Balvir Singh Vs. PSPCL and another.
