High CourtsSingle Bench

Sukhmander Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 December 2022 · Citation: (2022) 12 P&H CK 0028

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 148, 149, 160, 341, 342
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 4668 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 126 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J

The petitioners through instant petition are seeking setting aside of order dated 19.11.2019 (Annexure P-4) whereby trial Court has declared petitioners as proclaimed offenders in FIR No.214 dated 14.08.2017 (Annexure P/1) under Sections 341, 342, 160, 323, 148, 149 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda.

The petitioners, vide order dated 03.02.2020 were directed to appear before trial court within 7 days and trial court was directed to release the petitioner on interim bail.

Learned State counsel submits that as per order dated 11.11.2022 passed by JMIC, Bathinda, non-bailable warrants have been issued against petitioners.

In view of order dated 11.11.2022 passed by JMIC, Bathinda, the present petition has become infructuous.

No further order is warranted. Dismissed as infructuous.