High CourtsSingle Bench

Sukhpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab And Or

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 19 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 P&H CK 0146

HON’BLE JUDGES
Daya Chaudhary, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6705 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 240 words

Daya Chaudhary, J.

The prayer in the present petition is to extend the period of parole from 21.03.2018 to 07.05.2018. Petitioner was granted parole for a period of 42

days by the jail authorities vide order dated 06.02.2018 and that period is going to expire on 21.03.2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier parole was for repair of the house and to look after the agricultural activities and extension of

parole has been sought on the ground that wife of the petitioner is on the family way and presence of the petitioner is required during period of

delivery. The doctor has given the expected date of delivery as 28.04.2018.

To extend the period of parole for the purpose of delivery of the wife of the petitioner is a separate cause of action as earlier parole was for repair of

the house and to look after the agricultural activities. The petitioner is at liberty to move fresh application to the jail authorities for the cause which has

been mentioned in the present petition. In case such application is moved within a period of two weeks from the date of surrender before the jail

authorities, the respondent-authorities are directed to take action thereupon in accordance with law within a period of two weeks thereafter.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities after expiry of the period of parole which has been granted to him.

Disposed of.