High CourtsSingle Bench

Sukhwinder Kaur vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 14 March 2012 · Citation: (2012) 03 P&H CK 0347

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Tewari, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 4719 of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 148 words

Ajay Tewari, J.—Prayer in this writ petition is that due to clerical error, the merit of the petitioner has not been correctly computed. In this connection, the petitioner has moved representations dated 24.1.2012 and 21.2.2012 to respondent No. 2. Counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage she would be satisfied if the representations of the petitioner are decided by respondent No. 2 by passing a speaking order within any reasonable time. I find this to be a fair request. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation/s, as mentioned above, within 30 days from the receipt of a certified copy of this order, by passing a speaking order. In case, the petitioner is found entitled to relief claimed for, the same be also granted to her within the aforesaid period.

2.

No order as to costs.