AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 340 wordsThe matter has been heard via video conferencing.
Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred
to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Excise Case No.201 of 2020 dated 24.07.2020 instituted under Sections 30(a), 30(c) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The allegation against the petitioner and two others is that when the police raided the western bank of the pond in village Hussainabad, on
information that accused were manufacturing and selling country made liquor, the persons ran away, but from the site, 7 litres country made liquor,
one machine for making country made liquor, 100 kgs. fermented Mahua, one 14.2 kg gas cylinder and gas stove were recovered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she was not caught at the spot and on suspicion has been made accused. It was submitted that
there is no recovery from her possession or from her house and further, that she is a lady having no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP submitted that in the complaint itself it is written the petitioner was identified as the incident occurred in broad day light, but she
managed to escape as a crowd had gathered to witness the police raid. Thus, it was submitted that the present case shall not be maintainable in view
of bar under Section 76(2) of the Act.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to grant pre-
arrest bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
However, on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Court would observe that if the petitioner appears before the Court below
and prays for bail within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered, on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by
the present order.
