High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 UK CK 0040

Sulochana Chauhan vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 3 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 973 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 215 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the process for appointment of Mini Anganbari Karyakarti in Mini Anganbari Centre Dhara, Village Panchayat Jhotari,

Mori, District Uttarkashi.

2.

It is the case of the petitioner that respondent no. 6, who has applied for the post is not eligible for her selection to the post, because she is not a

resident of Dhara Tok of Village Jhotari. Petitioner seeks that an inquiry be ordered in the matter and the respondents be directed to decide the

representation, which has already been made by the petitioner.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that direction may be issued to the District Magistrate, Uttarkashi to decide the representation

dated 12.10.2020 filed by the petitioner, within a stipulated time.

5.

Learned State counsel gives a statement that the representation dated 12.10.2020 filed by the petitioner would be decided by the District

Magistrate, Uttarkashi within a period of two months from today.

6.

The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned State counsel.

7.

The writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the District Magistrate, Uttarkashi to decide the representation dated 12.10.2020 filed by the

petitioner within a period of two months from today.