High CourtsSingle Bench

Sultan Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 March 2022 · Citation: (2022) 03 RAJ CK 0016

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rameshwar Vyas, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 9 Of 2022 In S.B. Cr. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 609 Of 2021 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 896 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 163 words

Rameshwar Vyas, J

This matter comes upon an application filed by the appellants for rectification of the order dated 12.11.2021 passed by this Court in S.B. Cr. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 609/2021.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in the application submitted by the appellant seeking suspension of sentence, name of father of appellants Ummed Singh, Mahendra Singh and Manoj Kumar @ Pappu has wrongly been mentioned as Jora Ram, instead of Sultan Ram. In the impugned order, learned trial court has mentioned the correct name of father of the present appellants.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. In the impugned order, name of father of appellants Ummed Singh, Mahendra Singh and Manoj Kumar @ Pappu may be read as Sultan Ram instead of Jora Ram.

Now, the present appellants shall appear before this Court on 23.3.2022.

Appellants are granted two weeks’ time to furnish bail bonds in pursuance of the order dated 12.11.2021.