High CourtsSingle Bench

Suman Dwivedi vs Rakesh Kumar Kunwar & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0284

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 222 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 305 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner had questioned the condition of registration with Employment Exchange within State of Uttarakhand for purposes of employment under

the State. The said writ petition filed by her was allowed by Writ Court vide order dated 13.02.2017 and the following order was passed:

“4. In view of the above, the writ petition succeeds. A mandamus is issued to the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner according to her

marks obtained in the selection. It is, however, made clear that in case any candidate has already been given appointment in a particular district and a

particular school, this order will not affect his or her candidature and the posting of the petitioner be made elsewhere.â€​

2.

Alleging disobedience of the said order, petitioners have filed this Contempt Petition.

3.

Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that State of Uttarakhand had challenged the judgment rendered by Writ Court by filing Special Appeal

No. 547 of 2017 and the said Special Appeal of the State was allowed by Division Bench of this Court and the order passed by Writ Court was

modified and it was provided that the case of the writ petitioner shall be considered by the authorities, in accordance with her merit, without insisting

on compliance with the condition that she should have a valid registration with the employment exchange. The order dated 14.05.2019 passed by

Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 547 of 2017 is produced in Court today, which is taken on record.

4.

Since the order passed by Writ Court was modified in Special Appeal, therefore, in the humble opinion of this Court, this is not a case of willful

disobedience of the order passed by Writ Court.

5.

Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed.

6.

Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.