High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 06 P&H CK 0054

Suman @ Sumanbala and another vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amol Rattan Singh
CASE NUMBER
22119 of 2017 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 290 words
1.

The petitioners, who are present in the Court, are seeking

protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6,

who are stated to be the parents and brother of petitioner No.1, on account

of the fact that they have married each other of their own free will on

14.6.2017. Photographs of what is stated to be a marriage ceremony have

been annexed with the petition.

2.

As per the copies of the Birth Certificates issued by the Sub

Registrar, Births and Deaths, District Kapurthala (the originals of which

have been produced in Court), they are shown to be of legally marriageable

age.

3.

On a specific query put to learned counsel for the petitioners, it

has been stated that neither are the petitioners in any prohibited relationship

to each other, nor has any of them been married earlier. He states that he has

obtained specific instructions from the petitioners in that regard.

4.

Consequently, since protection of lives and liberty is a

fundamental right of every citizen enshrined in Article 21 of the

Constitution of India, this petition is disposed of with a direction to

respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners

are not put to any harm or threat at the hands of the aforesaid respondents or

at their behest.

5.

However, it is made clear that if any of the averments made in

the petition is found to be incorrect, specifically with regard to either the

petitioners being in any prohibited relationship to each other, or as regards

their previous marital status, or with regard to their age, this order shall not

be construed to be a bar on any proceedings initiated as per law.