High CourtsSingle Bench

Sumant Kumar @ Balmiki Paswan vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 9 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 PAT CK 0167

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhuresh Prasad, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 447
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 87303 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 394 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’), has been filed for quashing the order

dated 06.11.2019, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagha, West Champaran in Bagha (Bharoganj) P. S. Case No. 266 of 2019,

corresponding to G.R. No. 572 of 2019, by which the learned Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner and others for the offence

under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 447/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In spite of the final form having been submitted by the police to the extent that no case was made out against the petitioner, it is submitted that the

Court has taken cognizance of the offences under order dated 06.11.2019 in respect of all the offences. The order taking cognizance is in respect of

the petitioner along with other family members.

The prosecution story is in respect of a petty dispute. The informant’s she-goat had scattered the sand of Chandmal Paswan. Chandmal Paswan

being the father of the petitioner, his mother and petitioner started assaulting the informant and her husband. Specific allegation of assault was made

against the petitioner in respect of the informant.

The Court below, while taking cognizance, has also examined the materials collected during the course of investigation. The Court has taken note of

the fact that specific allegation was levelled against the petitioner. It is, in such circumstances, that cognizance has been taken against the petitioner

also. The scope of consideration at the stage of taking cognizance is well established in law. Once the allegations are made out then prima facie case

is to be considered by the Court on the basis of uncontroverted allegations for the limited purposes of taking cognizance.

Whether the petitioner was actually liable for the offences or whether it is a case of false implication is an issue which is to be examined by the Court

at the trial or the at the appropriate stage if raise by the petitioner. The order taking cognizance does not require any interference.

It is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that he would raise all the issues before the Court at the appropriate stage.

In view of the such submission,the application is disposed off with the liberty to raise his objection at the appropriate stage.