High CourtsSingle Bench

Sumendra Debbarma vs District And Sessions Judge, Dhalai Judicial District And 4 Others

Tripura High Court · Decided on 13 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 TP CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Lodh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order I Rule 10(2), Order 6 Rule 17,
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
I.A. 2 Of 2022 In Writ Petition (C) 477 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 129 words

Arindam Lodh, J

This is an application filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC, 1908 for amendment of the connected writ petition.

Heard Mr. A. Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for the applicant as well as Mr. P. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

Mr. Bhaumik, learned counsel has submitted that for the purpose of determining the real controversies and also subsequent developments, it is necessary to amend the writ petition.

Prayer stands allowed.

The petitioner is directed to file the amended writ petition within 7 (seven) days from today.

In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall also furnish a copy of the amended writ petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

Accordingly, the application stands allowed and disposed of.