AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 439 wordsManoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
Petitioner is an Assistant Teacher (Language) in Government Upper Primary School, Devar, Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag, where she was
posted in September, 2018. According to the petitioner, her transfer to the said school in 2018 was a mutual transfer with one Mr. Rajkumar, who had
sought transfer to the school where petitioner was serving.
Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.04.2021, whereby she has been adjusted in Government Upper Primary School, Uthind, Ukhimath,
District Rudraprauyag. This writ petition is directed against the said order passed on 12.04.2021 by District Education Officer, Elementary,
Rudraprayag.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order, petitioner has been adjusted in some other school in Block Ukhimath on the
ground that one Mr. Satye Singh Aswal, who was posted as regular language teacher in Government Upper Primary School, Devar, where petitioner
is presently serving, was transferred to some other school in the year 2018, since Mr. Satye Singh Aswal did not join at the transferred place,
therefore, by treating him to be posted in Government Upper Primary School, Devar, petitioner is being treated as surplus. Therefore, by the impugned
order, petitioner has been adjusted in some other school.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner is in no manner responsible for non-joining of Mr. Satye Singh Aswal at the
transferred place. Thus, according to him, the respondent-authority is not justified in passing the impugned order against the petitioner for a lapse
committed by Mr. Satye Singh Aswal.
Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. appearing for the State submits that transfer is an incidence of service. He further submits that if
petitioner is aggrieved by her adjustment in some other school by the impugned order, then instead of straightway rushing to this Court, she should
have approached the Competent Authority, by making a representation.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the
District Education Officer, Elementary, Rudraprayag within seven days from today. If such representation is made within the stipulated time, the
District Education Officer concerned shall look into the matter and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, within three weeks from the
date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
For a period of four weeks or till decision is taken, whichever is earlier, status quo as of today shall be maintained qua the posting of the petitioner.
All pending applications stand disposed of.
