High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 12 P&H CK 0212

Sunaina Hooda And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 December 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhir Mittal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1820 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 203 words
1.

The petitioners allege that they have performed their marriage against the wishes of their parents and thus, they fear for their lives and liberty. A representation dated 05.12.2019 (Annexure P-6) has been submitted to respondent No. 2 but he has not been taken any action thereupon.

2.

Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 3 only.

3.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Gill, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State of Punjab-respondents No. 1 to 3. Three copies of the paper book be supplied to him during the course of the day.

4.

Considering the nature of the order being passed there is no necessity to serve the private respondents or to seek a reply from any one of the respondents.

5.

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to take into consideration the request of the petitioners made vide representation dated 05.12.2019 (Annexure P-6) and to provide necessary protection in case the facts of the case so dictate.

6.

It is made clear that this order is not a bar on initiation of any proceedings in accordance with law nor is it an expression of opinion regarding the validity or otherwise of the marriage.