AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 140 wordsR.L. Anand, J.—The learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction of the petitioner. He has simply prayed for mercy in the matter of sentence. In support of his contention he submits that the petitioner has a large family to support and the accident in question took place as bad as on 22.9.1988. The learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection with regard to the reduction (sic).
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without (sic) precedent for the future, the substantive sentence of the petitioner u/s 304-A I.P.C. is reduced to nine months which shall run (sic) with the other sentences. The benefit of the sentence already suffered by the petitioner shall be granted to him.
With this modification in the matter of sentence, the revision stands disposed of.