High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunder Singh vs State of Haryana and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
H. S. Madaan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354A, 354D, 509
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous -M- No. 36136 of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 167 words

By way of filing the present petition, the petitioner prays for quashing of FIR No.348 dated 26.12.2017 for offences under Sections 354-A, 354-D, 509

IPC, registered with Police Station City Dabwali, District Sirsa, for the reason that the complainant has lodged false FIR against him due to pendency

of civil litigation. She had named son of the present petitioner, namely, Rajwant Singh, as the culprit. However, during the investigation conducted by

the police, he was found to be innocent and only petitioner has been challaned. It is stated that now the case is fixed for arguments on the point of

framing of charge.

Under the circumstances, the petitioner is relegated to the remedy of raising all these pleas before the trial Court at the time of addressing arguments

on the point of framing of charge and even if the trial Court does not agree with his contentions, he has got remedy of filing revision against the order

of charge.

With such observations, the petition stands disposed of.