AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 256 wordsManoj Kumar Garg, J
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 89/2022 of Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur, for the offence punishable under Sections 354A, 354D, 341, 506, 120B, 201 of IPC and Section 7/8, 9(G)/10, 11/12 of POCSO Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the similarly situated co-accused Sushil and Bachna Ram both have been granted bail by the trial Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to the co-accused. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sunil S/o Heeraram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.89/2022 of Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.