High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunil Dutt vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 26 February 2010 · Citation: (2010) 02 P&H CK 0328

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajai Lamba, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25 · Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 394, 397, 411
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2114 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 170 words

Ajai Lamba, J.—This petition has been filed u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 3 dated 4.1.2009 under Sections 394, 397, 411 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Sonipat.

2.

Learned Counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Jai Parkash, Assistant Sub Inspector, at the very outset has pointed out that the petitioner is involved in two earlier cases of similar nature. So far as the present case is concerned, the vehicle was snatched. The driver was assaulted. The money available was also taken away. So far as the legal evidence so as to connect the petitioner is concerned, recoveries have been effected which connect the petitioner with the offence.

3.

In view of the antecedents and nature of offence committed by the petitioner, no ground to allow bail to the petitioner is made out.

4.

The petition is dismissed.

5.

However, in view of the custody of the petitioner, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.