High CourtsDivision Bench

Sunil Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 17 August 2020 · Citation: (2020) 08 SHI CK 0136

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narayana Swamy, CJ: Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 2874 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 201 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

The petitioner, who is working as a Pharmacist under Rogi Kalyan Samiti at Primary Health Centre, Kholanal, Block Janjehli, District Mandi, H.P.,

has come up before this Court seeking his transfer from a Tribal/difficult area to the stations of his choice, as per clause 16.1 of the Comprehensive

Guiding Principles-2013, of the transfer policy applicable in the State of Himachal Pradesh, which provides that the normal tenure of stay of posting in

Most Difficult/Difficult/ Tribal/and the Hard areas shall be two winters and three summers.

2.

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Senior Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

3.

In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.

4.

Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation to the first respondent, within one week,

mentioning therein the stations of his choice, in accordance with the transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the said respondent shall

consider the same, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, and pass appropriate orders, within two weeks. Pending application(s), if any,

are closed.