High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunil Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 27 July 2020 · Citation: (2020) 07 RAJ CK 0067

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Bhandari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 342, 363, 366A, 376, 376(2)(n) · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4, 5(L), 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6058 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

2.

F.I.R. No. 173/2020 was registered at Police Station Beawar City District Ajmer for offence under Sections 342, 363, 366-A, 376, 376(2)(n) of

I.P.C. & Section 3/4, 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act.

3.

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that as per Aadhar Card, the date of birth of the prosecutrix is 01.01.2000. She has entered into a

registered marriage with the petitioner.

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5.

I have considered the contentions.

6.

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7.

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all

subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.